-
@stephenanderson Expected nothing less ;) Some examples of the ‘toolboxes’ that inspired my tweet: bit.ly/2pJjZKn bit.ly/34ex4Kz bit.ly/2OakfLQ bit.ly/34cIe2n bit.ly/338hbE5 bit.ly/34cQ4Jv bit.ly/2D6MuEN bit.ly/2XFblJkOn twitter.com
❤️ 2 Favorites Mood +2 🙂
-
@stephenanderson Most basically, I was reacting to what seems like a shift in the way people / companies / teams / consultants talk about what they do and how (in service of product development) from ‘here’s our process’ to ‘here’s our tooklit’.Permalink On twitter.com
-
@stephenanderson Might go so far as to say I have a hypothesis that we’re at one of those fulcrum moments around how the work gets done. In the historical structure of disciplines, there’s a recognizable cyclical oscillation of entry points: “We know the process” vs "We know the tools”.Permalink On twitter.com
-
@stephenanderson It’s the driving factors for the oscillation — how fast, how long to complete a cycle, can you change the pace of or even interrupt the swing, and where the field is at any particular moment — that’s most interesting (to me, when tweeting…).Permalink On twitter.com
-
@stephenanderson [Here I'm pre-blocking anyone tempted to employ the Cynefin maneuver {how’s that for a generationally triple work score via multi-layered Kevin Bacon / John Cusack ref…} - we know the core pattern in relative character & degrees of domain structuration.].Permalink On twitter.com
-
@stephenanderson With all those pre-qualifiers - what’s your take? (And, anyone else? {Beuller?})Permalink On twitter.com
-
@stephenanderson Baseline ingredients are obviously a mixture of change vectors: rise of Lean practices, shifts to outcomes-centric cultures, decentralization of organizations, turbulence in org structures at all levels of scale / the death of hierarchy, network effects, etc.Permalink On twitter.com